By Fan Yu
Beijing experienced limited success in its quest to overtake the U.S. dollar as the global trade currency. But it may have an easier time convincing the world of its government bonds as an investment alternative to U.S. treasuries.
So far in 2021, Chinese government bonds have far exceeded the performance of their U.S. counterparts.
Since Jan. 1, Chinese government bonds were relatively flat in terms of returns from Jan. 1 through the end of March. In contrast, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasuries Total Return index fell 4.2 percent during the same period.
Some investment experts think Chinese government bonds could usurp U.S. treasuries as the de facto “haven” asset.
“China’s emergence as a new and credible safe haven destination for bondholders should gradually chip away at the status of the dollar and U.S. Treasuries as the only safe place to hide,” Gustavo Medeiros, deputy head of research at Ashmore Group, recently told Bloomberg. Ashmore is an emerging market investment firm with almost $100 billion in assets under management as of Dec. 31, 2020.
Morgan Stanley also expects foreign investors to continue pouring into China’s government bonds, as “valuations remain attractive vs. other (developed markets) bonds and provide huge diversification benefits for global fixed income portfolios,” Asia Chief Economist Robin Xing wrote in a March 5 note to clients.
The ongoing push from banks and brokers cannot be overlooked.
Last February, J.P. Morgan Chase added Chinese local government bonds into its JPMorgan Government Bond Index—Emerging Markets. In September 2020, FTSE Russell announced it would add Chinese government bonds to its World Government Bond Index. Combined, these two index additions could drive more than $100 billion of inflows from foreign insurers, asset managers, and pension funds into Chinese government bonds.
While arguments for diversification are not new, investors have been buying into this view more recently because of the rout U.S. treasuries have suffered so far this year. Treasuries fell their most in more than a decade to due to steepening of the yield curve on specters of higher inflation and the Federal Reserve’s continued dovishness.
Despite the recent price declines in treasuries, there is still a significant yield gap between Chinese government bonds and treasuries. The Federal Reserve has signaled that rates will stay near zero until 2023, so there’s little reprise on the horizon for U.S. bond investors.
As of April 9, 10-year treasuries are yielding 1.66 percent. By comparison, the 10-year China government bond is yielding almost twice that amount at 3.23 percent. Of course, China’s government creditworthiness is less stellar—it is rated A+ by S&P and Fitch, while the United States is rated higher at AA+ and AAA respectively.
Government bonds in the United States and Europe pay such little interest that many investors are forced to go elsewhere to obtain sufficient returns. And is especially true for pension funds and insurance companies that must meet certain returns in order to generate sufficient cash to pay liabilities.
And while Chinese corporate bonds have garnered recent headlines around increased default rates and less presumed support by Beijing, Chinese government bonds are believed to be far safer. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will likely let far more private corporate bonds default before its central government bonds are allowed to default.
But the investment thesis in Chinese government bonds is not as clear cut as the economics would suggest.
Chinese debt market is far smaller—and less liquid—than the $21 trillion U.S. treasuries market. Unlike the massive U.S. treasuries outstanding, Chinese government bond issuances are less than 20 percent of China’s GDP, according to JP Morgan estimates. The lower liquidity means the bid-ask spread on Chinese bonds are far greater than government bonds issued by the United States, Germany, Japan, or the UK.
And market access remains a big obstacle. While China has loosened restrictions on who can purchase its bonds, foreign investors are still limited to accessing through Hong Kong (Bond Connect) and applying for Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor (QFII) program.
FTSE Russell, which initially said the inclusion of Chinese bonds would take less than 12 months, announced in March that the phase-in period could take up to 36 months after some client feedback regarding liquidity and market access.
- Rally in Massachusetts Calls for Removing COVID-19 Mask Restrictions: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai
- Michigan Woman Died of ‘Complications’ After Getting COVID-19 Vaccine: Family
- Republicans: Break Up Big Tech After Facebook Board Upholds Trump Ban
- Parents Should Oppose Critical Race Theory to ‘Save Our Kids’ from Left-Wing Indoctrination: AG Paxton
- Trump Endorses Elise Stefanik to Replace Liz Cheney in House GOP Leadership
- Denmark Drops Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 Vaccine Over Possible Blood Clot Link on
- Ghislaine Maxwell’s Sex Crimes Trial in New York Delayed Until Fall on
- Trump Promises ‘Orderly Transition’ After Biden Certified as President-Elect on
- Trump Says Supreme Court ‘Incompetent and Weak’ Over Election Fraud on
- NH’s Voting Machines Are Capable of Redistributing Votes on