By Louis Casiano | Fox News

Democrats reacted with disappointment to Friday’s Supreme Court ruling allowing the Trump administration to divert $2.5 billion in Pentagon funds for border wall construction.

The 5-4 ruling, which broke along ideological lines, means President Trump can tap into military funds to begin work to replace fencing along the southern border in California, Arizona and New Mexico. Earlier this month, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco had agreed with a lower-court ruling that prevented the government from tapping that funding.

Trump declared a national emergency along the border to get up to $8.1 billion for wall construction, including the $2.5 billion from the Defense Department. He called the ruling a big win for “Border Security and the Rule of Law.”

TRUMP ANNOUNCES ‘LANDMARK AGREEMENT’ WITH GUATEMALA TO RESTRICT ASYLUM CLAIMS

“Wow! Big VICTORY on the Wall. The United States Supreme Court overturns lower court injunction, allows Southern Border Wall to proceed. Big WIN for Border Security and the Rule of Law!” he tweeted.

Donald J. Trump✔@realDonaldTrump

Wow! Big VICTORY on the Wall. The United States Supreme Court overturns lower court injunction, allows Southern Border Wall to proceed. Big WIN for Border Security and the Rule of Law!159K6:37 PM – Jul 26, 2019

Prominent Democrats criticized the court’s logic and Trump’s plans to use earmarked funds in an effort to come through on his signature campaign issue. Many argue a wall will not slow the flow of migrants into the United States.

Arizona Rep. Raul M. Grijalva, whose district runs along the U.S.-Mexico border, called Trump’s emergency declaration a “pathetic attempt to circumvent Congress.”

“Trump’s fake emergency was nothing more than a pathetic ploy to circumvent Congress and build his monument to his racist policies. This fight is not over, and I will continue fighting Trump’s efforts to destroy our environment and militarize border communities. #NoBorderWall,” he tweeted soon after the ruling broke.

Raul M. Grijalva✔@RepRaulGrijalva

Trump’s fake emergency was nothing more than a pathetic ploy to circumvent Congress and build his monument to his racist policies. This fight is not over, and I will continue fighting Trump’s efforts to destroy our environment and militarize border communities. #NoBorderWall https://twitter.com/msnbc/status/1154891038076678144 …MSNBC✔@MSNBCBREAKING: U.S. Supreme Court rules President Trump can use disputed military funding to help build border wall. https://nbcnews.to/2ZeIA6h 2017:47 PM – Jul 26, 2019

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., called the ruling “deeply flawed” over Twitter.

“This evening’s Supreme Court ruling allowing @realDonaldTrump to steal military funds to spend on a wasteful, ineffective border wall rejected by Congress is deeply flawed. Our Founders designed a democracy governed by the people — not a monarchy.”

Nancy Pelosi✔@SpeakerPelosi

This evening’s Supreme Court ruling allowing @realDonaldTrump to steal military funds to spend on a wasteful, ineffective border wall rejected by Congress is deeply flawed. Our Founders designed a democracy governed by the people — not a monarchy.56.5K7:44 PM – Jul 26, 2019

For his part, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer reminded his Twitter followers that when Trump was still a candidate for president, he promised that Mexico would pay for a border wall.

“It’s a sad day when the president is cheering a decision that may allow him to steal funds from our military to pay for an ineffective and expensive wall for which he promised Mexico would foot the bill,” he posted.

He followed up with another tweet saying he hopes the courts will conclude Trump doesn’t have the authority to build the wall.

Chuck Schumer✔@SenSchumer · 13hReplying to @SenSchumer

This is a deeply regrettable and nonsensical decision and flies in the face of the will of Congress and the Congress’s exclusive power of the purse, which our founders established in the Constitution.

Chuck Schumer✔@SenSchumer

As litigation continues, I hope that the courts ultimately reach the correct decision that the president doesn’t have the authority to build his ineffective and expensive wall.2,4828:55 PM – Jul 26, 2019

Several Democratic presidential candidates also chimed in.

“Taking away money from the Defense Department to build a wall will not make us any safer. Trump’s political stunt will harm border communities & ignores the root causes of migration. We deserve a president with a common sense & compassionate immigration plan,” former Housing Secretary Julian Castro tweeted.

Julián Castro✔@JulianCastro

Taking away money from the Defense Department to build a wall will not make us any safer.

Trump’s political stunt will harm border communities & ignores the root causes of migration.

We deserve a president with a common sense & compassionate immigration plan. https://twitter.com/ZoeTillman/status/1154881102525472768 …Zoe Tillman✔@ZoeTillmanNOW: In a divided decision, the Supreme Court rules the Trump administration can begin using some of the contested federal funds Trump redirected for border wall construction — the court granted the admin’s request to stay a lower court injunction https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6219674/7-26-19-SCOTUS-Sierra-Club-Order.pdf …8457:44 PM – Jul 26, 2019

Former Texas congressman Beto O’Rourke, also in the running for the Democratic presidential nomination, likewise expressed disappointment.

“Deeply disappointed in the Supreme Court’s decision. I’ve long opposed building walls, and while in Congress, I introduced language to prevent DOD funds from being used to plan or build a wall along our border. As President, I would do everything in my power to make that law.”

Beto O’Rourke✔@BetoORourke

We don’t need more walls. They don’t make us more safe. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2019/07/26/supreme-court-says-trump-can-proceed-with-plan-to-spend-military-funds-for-border-wall-construction/?utm_term=.a0247b6b442f&wpisrc=al_news__alert-politics–alert-national&wpmk=1 …Supreme Court says Trump can proceed with plan to spend military funds for border wall constructionThe Trump administration moved to reallocate the money earlier this year, after Congress denied the president’s full request for border wall construction funds. The Sierra Club and a coalition of…washingtonpost.com

Beto O’Rourke✔@BetoORourke

Deeply disappointed in the Supreme Court’s decision. I’ve long opposed building walls, and while in Congress, I introduced language to prevent DOD funds from being used to plan or build a wall along our border. As President, I would do everything in my power to make that law.4,8867:53 PM – Jul 26, 2019

“Congress did not appropriate these funds for Trump’s medieval vanity project. Let’s be clear: Trump’s wall has never been about keeping the American people safe,” tweeted California Sen. Kamala Harris.

Kamala Harris✔@KamalaHarris

Congress did not appropriate these funds for Trump’s medieval vanity project. Let’s be clear: Trump’s wall has never been about keeping the American people safe. https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1154881004601040896 …The Washington Post✔@washingtonpostSupreme Court says Trump can proceed with plan to spend military funds for border wall construction https://wapo.st/32SUvca 9,6508:19 PM – Jul 26, 2019

“Diverting military funds for a vanity project is exactly who Donald Trump is. I will continue to fight back and join with those already challenging this wrong and misguided decision,” New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker.

Cory Booker✔@CoryBooker

Diverting military funds for a vanity project is exactly who Donald Trump is. I will continue to fight back and join with those already challenging this wrong and misguided decision. https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1154881004601040896 …The Washington Post✔@washingtonpostSupreme Court says Trump can proceed with plan to spend military funds for border wall construction https://wapo.st/32SUvca 2,5198:08 PM – Jul 26, 2019

The American Civil Liberties Union said it plans to fight to keep Trump from using the funds for a wall that’s already been denied by Congress.

Foe News reporter Alex Pappas contributed to this report. 

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

NH Politician

NH POLITICIAN is a New Hampshire based media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information, local, national and world news. Our team of reporters,...