The false economics of critical race theory
The false economics of critical race theory

By Dennis L. Weissman

A competitive market is efficient in consumption and production. It produces the goods and services that consumers demand, and no more, at the lowest possible cost. Nonetheless, the forces of supply and demand do not necessarily produce an equitable allocation of goods and services — an equal distribution of the economy’s output. These distributional disparities arise primarily because individual abilities, skills, and effort levels can differ widely across the population.

Critical race theory offers an alternative explanation for the unequal distribution of income: systemic discrimination and the exercise of “white privilege.” This is the rationale behind promoting “social equity” rather than equal opportunity.

The financial returns that workers realize are positively correlated with their skills, education, and ability and negatively correlated with discrimination. The contention that discrimination is the sole cause of unequal achievement is fallacious, and policies based on this premise threaten the foundations of a market economy.

Moral hazard is the undoing of socialist economies. Income redistribution means that the financial gains from skills acquisition and effort are not fully retained by those who make such investments. Workers eventually figure out that attempts to “get ahead” are futile and give up. Socialism has repeatedly failed because it dulls incentives to acquire skills and exert effort that increases the likelihood of greater financial returns for workers and higher productivity growth for the economy.

The framers understood the need for the government to protect the rights of citizens to acquire property in accordance with their skills and abilities. To wit, writing in Federalist 10, James Madison observed:The diversity in the faculties of men, from which the rights of property originate, is not less an insuperable obstacle to a uniformity of interests. The protection of these faculties is the first object of government. From the protection of different and unequal faculties of acquiring property, the possession of different degrees and kinds of property immediately results; and from the influence of these on the sentiments and views of the respective proprietors ensues a division of the society into different interests and parties.

It is not the proper function of government in a market economy to correct for any disparities in the distribution of income, irrespective of origin. Critical race theory proponents argue that it should because the disparities are caused by vestiges of slavery, still deeply entrenched in America’s institutions. The implication is that the country has yet to pay a sufficiently high price for slavery.

This is a debatable proposition. That slavery was a barbaric institution that Americans paid dearly to abolish is not in dispute. President Abraham Lincoln waged war against his fellow citizens rather than allow slavery to expand into the new western territories. One study finds that almost 2.5% of the U.S. population perished in the Civil War. Union troop deaths exceeded 400,000, with an additional 282,000 injured. With 4 million slaves in the U.S., this equates to one Union soldier killed for every 10 slaves freed.

The fact that racial parity in earnings remains elusive has led to a multitude of programs that seek to correct for this imbalance, including affirmative action, set-aside contracts for minority-owned businesses, and racial preferences in college admissions. This is a zero-sum game; an economic advantage for one group is an economic disadvantage for another. The longer these programs remain in place, the less compelling the argument that discrimination and white privilege alone explain the disparities.

A market economy is driven by private incentives to realize financial returns commensurate with ability, effort, and skills. These incentives are weakened when the goal of equal opportunity is replaced with social equity — because any disparities in the distribution of income are reflexively deemed to be the product of discrimination and white privilege that can only be remedied through redistribution. The price the country pays for this type of social equity is the breakdown of its market economy.

Dennis Weisman is professor of economics emeritus at Kansas State University.

Affiliate News Feeds

  • Reuters
  • Washington Examiner
  • The Federalist
  • The Epoch Times
  • The Guardian
  • The Gateway Pundit
  • Judicial Watch

By Tom Ozimek Elon Musk suggested that Twitter was acting under government orders to suppress free speech, with his remarks coming hot on the heels of the release of a trove of… [...]

By The Associated Press PALMDALE , Calif.—America’s newest nuclear stealth bomber made its debut Friday after years of secret development and as part of the Pentagon’s answer to rising concerns over a future… [...]

Union workers are lashing out at both political parties and President Joe Biden for the rail legislation signed to prevent a strike, calling the provisions a "slap in the face"… [...]

A former professor at the University of California San Diego said she gave all of her students "A" grades and no homework in a recently unearthed video. [...]

Usually when a person defrauds investors of millions of dollars and launders the funds to personal pet projects, he goes to jail. (See: Bernie Madoff.) But in FTX founder Sam… [...]

Insider documents released on Friday confirm Twitter’s decision to suppress the New York Post’s legitimate reporting about Hunter Biden’s laptop mere weeks before the 2020 presidential election was a political… [...]

The State of Wyoming filed a second lawsuit against the Biden Administration, alleging that its suspension of oil lease sales were illegal. Gov. Mark Gordon (R-Wyom.) announced that his state… [...]

Actor James Woods said he plans to sue the Democratic National Committee (DNC) after Elon Musk shared explosive “Twitter Files” disclosures appearing to show that the DNC asked Twitter to… [...]

Policy could distract party from pushing through other urgent measures, leader is toldKeir Starmer has been warned by Labour peers that he risks getting bogged down in a “constitutional quagmire”… [...]

Exclusive: Stage sequel to focus on then housing secretary, fire chief and two families devastated by 2017 fireA play dramatising the “merry-go-round of buck-passing” at the Grenfell Tower public inquiry… [...]

Over the last few years, the U.S. Military has been politicized by the left. This is having the unfortunate effect of eroding the public’s trust in the institution. Just in… [...]

In Elon Musk’s most recent Twitter Space, Musk shared how he felt about Ye’s recent Twitter ban. The usually calm and collected Musk let out a rare burst of raw… [...]

Secret Service Repeatedly Changes Its Story on Hunter Biden Gun Records What is the Secret Service Hiding about Biden Raid on Trump’s Home? Judicial Watch Sues to Find Out! Judicial… [...]

From Fox News: The Secret Service will not say why they changed their position regarding a government watchdog’s records request into Hunter Biden’s gun investigation records. Government watchdog Judicial Watch… [...]

NH Politician

NH POLITICIAN is owned and operated by USNN World News Corporation, a New Hampshire based media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information, local,...