By Ken Silva
Much attention has been paid this week to bombshell allegations that Israeli-created spyware may have been used to target journalists, dissidents, and other enemies of the state—but the Pegasus scandal is a mere microcosm of the larger issue of governments using private companies for surveillance operations.
On July 18, the Guardian and 16 other media outlets began publishing a series of stories about the Israeli-based NSO Group, alleging that foreign governments used the company’s Pegasus software to surveil at least 180 journalists and numerous other targets around the world.
Developed by former members of the elite Israeli Unit 8200—comparable to the U.S. National Security Agency—the Pegasus software allegedly infects iPhones and Androids, enabling operators to extract messages, photos and emails, record calls and activate microphones in secret.
Alleged possible targets of Pegasus surveillance include the slain Washington Post writer Jamal Khashoggi, France president Emmanuel Macron, and Indian opposition legislator Rahul Gandhi, along with numerous others. NSO explicitly denies its software was “associated in any way with the heinous murder of Jamal Khashoggi.”
Allegations about the NSO Group’s wrongdoing have been in the media for years. Facebook sued the NSO Group in U.S. federal court in 2019 for allegedly exploiting a vulnerability in WhatsApp, allowing Pegasus users to spy on the calls and messages of victims, including journalists and human rights activists. This case is pending appeal in the Ninth Circuit, where the NSO Group has argued that it should have sovereign immunity from civil litigation.
But while Pegasus was already public knowledge, this week’s reporting casts doubt on the NSO Group’s longstanding contention that it only intends for the software to be used in counterterrorism and other major criminal probes. The Guardian and other media reportedly obtained a copy of the NSO Group’s targeting database, which has a list of 50,000 phone numbers that clients may have targeted for surveillance—suggesting that the only way the NSO Group did not know the identity of its clients’ targets was through willful ignorance.
The NSO Group has continued to deny wrongdoing, saying that the media outlets misinterpreted the data.
“The [reports are] full of wrong assumptions and uncorroborated theories that raise serious doubts about the reliability and interests of the sources. It seems like the ‘unidentified sources’ have supplied information that has no factual basis and are far from reality,” the NSO Group has said publicly. “After checking their claims, we firmly deny the false allegations made in their report. Their sources have supplied them with information which has no factual basis, as evident by the lack of supporting documentation for many of their claims.”
“In fact, these allegations are so outrageous and far from reality, that NSO is considering a defamation lawsuit,” the Israeli company added.
Law enforcement in France and Hungary have already launched investigations into the use of Pegasus, and the Israeli parliament’s Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee has formed a committee that will look into the matter.
Meanwhile, the Moroccan government has hit back against some of the Pegasus reporting, filing a defamation lawsuit in Paris against two French-based organizations for allegedly publishing false claims that Moroccan investigators illegally used Pegasus to target government officials.
The Moroccan government “does not intend to let the multiple lies and fake news spread these past few days go unpunished,” the government’s lawyer reportedly said Thursday.
The NSO Group may be the object of wrath after this week’s reporting, but NSO is hardly the only company in the business of selling surveillance equipment to governments. Before the Pegasus scandal hit the headlines, the Canada-based research group Citizen Lab released a report on the Israeli company Candiru—named after the infamous fish known for swimming up a man’s urethra—alleging that the firm has engaged in many of the same activities as NSO.
Nor are private surveillance firms exclusive to Israel. In the United States, a company called Clearview AI has received notoriety over the last year, after the New York Times reported that the company was scraping billions of photos to develop facial recognition software for law enforcers at home and abroad. It was also revealed last year that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and other agencies had been purchasing data in bulk from private companies.
Legal scholars have raised concerns that surveillance companies pose a particularly onerous threat to privacy in the United States, because the Fourth Amendment restrictions on surveillance do not apply to private companies.
“If law enforcement agencies can buy their way around the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement, the landmark protection announced by the Supreme Court in Carpenter will be in peril,” the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said in a public statement last December. “Despite federal agencies spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on access to cell phone location databases, those agencies have not publicly explained their legal justifications or internal limitations on access to this invasive information.”
U.S. Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.) introduced legislation in April intended to address some of the constitutional issues presented by emerging surveillance technologies. Their Fourth Amendment is Not for Sale Act would place warrant requirements on government purchases of bulk data, and would take away the U.S. attorney general’s ability to give civil immunity to companies that unlawfully sell bulk data to government agencies.
But even though the Fourth Amendment is Not for Sale Act has the bipartisan support of 19 cosponsors, the bill has yet to receive a hearing.
Affiliate News Feeds
- Washington Examiner
- The Federalist
- The Epoch Times
- The Guardian
- The Gateway Pundit
- Judicial Watch
By Zachary Stieber The U.S. Senate on Nov. 29 approved the “Respect for Marriage Act,” with a dozen Republicans crossing the aisle to vote yes. See below how each senator voted for the bill… [...]
The University of Florida College of Medicine has scrubbed its website of mentions of Black Lives Matter and other racialized content after a report highlighted the medical school's implementation of… [...]
Several Senate Republicans have reiterated their demand that the U.S. military drop its coronavirus vaccine mandate and urged Republican leadership to use the National Defense Authorization Act as leverage in… [...]
More than a dozen Republican senators are demanding that the party’s Senate leadership move for the upper chamber to consider an amendment that would end the military’s Covid shot mandate… [...]
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and 19 other senators are threatening not to vote for new defense spending unless there’s also a vote to end the military’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate. “We’re… [...]
Exclusive: Evidence to UK Covid inquiry describes missed chances to improve test-and-trace regime in early days of pandemicPublic health leaders were slow to act on repeated warnings over Christmas 2020… [...]
Former lady-in-waiting to queen issues apology after Ngozi Fulani questioned over where her ‘people’ came fromThe late queen’s lady-in-waiting has resigned and apologised after a black guest at a reception… [...]
A new book about Queen Elizabeth II has revealed the Queen had a one-word response regarding Prince Andrew’s Epstein scandal. In early January, the Queen stripped Prince Andrew of all… [...]
The Biden economy is a mess and it’s getting worse. Now even the far-left media can’t hide the mess. Why would any union member vote for Joe Biden? Today’s job… [...]
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for all records of communications… [...]
Though years ago India passed a sweeping law giving transgender people rights—and prohibiting discrimination in education, employment, and healthcare—the Biden administration is spending American taxpayer dollars to counter stigma and… [...]